Use case
Test case creation
How many of your requirements have a test case you can point to right now?
The challenge
V&V planning. Test cases have to be written and tied back to requirements. It is slow, and it is where traceability either holds or quietly breaks.
The risk is not only the missing test case - traceability tools surface those quickly. The deeper problem is the wrong link: a requirement pointed at a test protocol that does not actually cover it, or a test result that validates something different from what was specified. That error propagates silently until an auditor traces it.
How our solution helps
Our AI companion "Flurina" drafts test cases and aligns them to your requirements.
It then flags requirements with no coverage and surfaces links to wrong protocols or mismatched test results. The traceability is checked as you go, not reconstructed before an audit. Faster V&V, verified by default. The wrong link shows up while you can still correct it.
What it costs when the file drifts
~15
documents per device that requirement-to-test traceability must hold across
4 months
of a year the average team loses to documentation work
53%
of manufacturers have reduced R&D under the documentation burden
Sources: EU MDR; MedTech Europe MDR/IVDR Survey (2025)
FAQ
Any questions? We’re happy to help.
Does it write test cases or just check them?
It aligns test cases to your requirements, flags requirements with no test, and surfaces links to wrong protocols or mismatched results.
Will they be traceable to requirements?
Yes. The links are checked as you write, not reconstructed before an audit.
Do we still review them?
Yes. You review and validate. It removes the blank page and the gap hunting.
See where your file actually stands
Pull your requirements list. Count how many you can match to a specific test case in under a minute.
Book a demo
